<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>C&#38;M* &#62; UK Online PR Agency + Social Media Agency + Social SEO Agency &#187; Google Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/tag/google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk</link>
	<description>C&#38;M* is an Online PR, SEO and Social Media Agency. We help Hackett, TomTom, IBM and Continental get real, measurable marketing results from Social Media...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:16:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google News Round Up: Wave, Images and Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/social-media-pr-blog/google-news-round-up-wave-images-and-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/social-media-pr-blog/google-news-round-up-wave-images-and-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake Doran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Online / Social Media PR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News Round-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/?p=7075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If this were the 1920s and I were a 12 year old newspaper tyke in Chicago, I’d be shouting ‘Extra! Extra! Read all about it! Google news, hot off the press!’</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this were the 1920s and I were a 12 year old newspaper tyke in Chicago, I’d be shouting ‘Extra! Extra! Read all about it! Google news, hot off the press!’</p>

<p>But it’s not the 1920s and I&#8217;m not in Chicago, so I’m writing a blog post about Google instead. Read all about it.</p>

	<p><h2>Google Wave is Dead</h2><br />
<p>It truly is a sad, sad day. Wave has only been out of the invite-only phase for a couple of months and now Google has announced that it will no <a href=”http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/08/update-on-google-wave.html”>longer be supporting it</a>, saying:</p>

<p align=center><em>&#8220;Wave has not seen the user adoption we would have liked. We don’t plan to continue developing Wave as a standalone product, but we will maintain the site at least through the end of the year and extend the technology for use in other Google projects.&#8221;</em></p>

<p>So I’ve got a year left to continue not using it. I’m not sure how comfortable I am with my free will being taken away though &#8211; I want my not using Wave to be <em>my</em> choice, not Google’s. Damn the Man. It&#8217;s also rather jarring to look back on the glassy-eyed optimism displayed in the promotional video embedded in <a href="http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/social-media-pr-blog/google-wave-coverage-round-up/">David&#8217;s &#8216;Google Wave First Impressions News Round-up&#8217;</a> post from last year. Wonder what those two think about it?</p><br />
<span id="more-7075"></span><br />
<h2>New Style Google Images</h2><br />
<p>Google Images has had a bit of a makeover this week, as well as the addition of some new functionality. There are now many more images displayed in the same amount of space, which makes it a lot easier to find the image you’re looking for. Here’s the old style results page:</p>

<p align="center"><a href="http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/wp-content/upload//2010/08/google-image-search-ads-jan09.png"><img src="http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/wp-content/upload//2010/08/google-image-search-ads-jan09.png" alt="Google Image search old style" title="Google Image search old style" width="600" height="389" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7074" /></a></p>

	<p></p>&#8230;and here’s the new one:</p></p>

<p align="center"><a href="http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/wp-content/upload//2010/08/Picture-2.png"><img src="http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/wp-content/upload//2010/08/Picture-2-1024x603.png" alt="New image search" title="New Image search" width="512" height="301" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7077" /></a></p>

<p>Google has also eliminated the concept of having pages of results. Rather than having to click through to another page, you can simply keep scrolling down and the page will populate itself with images that load on the page as you get closer to them, rather than having to wait for the system to load hundreds of images. It’s a nice addition and it works well.</p>

<h2>Net Neutrality Threatened?</h2>
<p>Talks are currently being held in the US to discuss the future of net neutrality (where all pages on the Web are treated the same in terms of priority and speed). It has been reported by <a href=”http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/aug/05/google-verizon-net-neutrality”>The Guardian</a> and the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/05/technology/05secret.html?_r=2&#038;hp=&#038;pagewanted=all">New York Times</a> that Google and <a href="http://www.verizon.com">Verizon</a> were very close to a deal to end net neutrality. From The Guardian piece:</p>

<p align=center><em>“Such a deal would mean the information superhighway may be about to get a lot faster for those willing to pay. YouTube, owned by Google, for example, would pay a charge to an internet service provider (<span class="caps">ISP</span>) in return for its content being fast-tracked to consumers.”</em></p>

<p>This is a pretty controversial issue, which could potentially give a lot more power to bigger companies and lead to consumers having to pay twice for access to the Internet.</p>

<p>And the story doesn’t stop there. On its Twitter stream yesterday, Google refuted claims by the New York Times that it was in talks with Verizon with <a href=”http://twitter.com/googlepubpolicy/status/20393606477”>this tweet</a>:</p>

<p align="center"><a href="http://twitter.com/googlepubpolicy"><img src="http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/wp-content/upload//2010/08/Picture-3.png" alt="Google's tweet" title="Google's tweet" width="573" height="284" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7080" /></a></p>

<p>Exciting stuff. Clearly this story hasn’t fully played out, so we’ll all have to keep watching.</p>

<p>And that&#8217;s it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/social-media-pr-blog/google-news-round-up-wave-images-and-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wave: First Impressions and Buzz Round-up</title>
		<link>http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/social-media-pr-blog/google-wave-coverage-round-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/social-media-pr-blog/google-wave-coverage-round-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Preece</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Online / Social Media PR Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Preece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online PR Agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/?p=3885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems the web has gone slightly bonkers over Google Wave. With invites being offered across the Twittersphere, and enterprising/mercenary individuals putting them up for sale for as much as $50 each on eBay, what could possibly justify this incredible amount of interest?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It seems the web has gone slightly bonkers over <strong><a href="http://wave.google.com/" title="Google Wave">Google Wave</a></strong>. With invites being offered (rather duplicitously in most cases, I might add) across the Twittersphere, and enterprising/mercenary individuals putting them up for sale for as much as $50 each on eBay, what could possibly justify this incredible amount of interest?</p>

	<p>For those who have had no exposure to it thus far, Google Wave is a communication and collaboration tool, but with impressive versatility and power as the official introduction video demonstrates:</p>

	<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p6pgxLaDdQw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p6pgxLaDdQw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>

	<p>While it’s still early days (Wave is officially in ‘preview’ mode at the moment, but already has “several hundred thousand” users according to co-developer Lars Rasmussen), some genuinely creative and inspired uses of Google Wave have already started appearing. Sites such as <strong><a href="http://www.mashable.com/" title="Mashable!">Mashable</a></strong> have been reporting on Wave being used for <a href="http://blog.sforce.com/sforce/2009/09/getting-in-front-of-the-wave.html" title="Salesforce.com Blog: Getting In Front of The Wave">customer service</a>, <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/11/08/google-wave-better-than-twitter-conference/" title="Mashable: Google Wave - Better than Twitter for Conference Chatter?">live-annotating conferences</a> and even acting as the engine for <a href="http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/10/google-wave-we-came-we-saw-we-played-dd.ars" title="Ars Technica: Google Wave - We Came, We Saw, We Played D&#038;D">online role-playing games</a>. </p>

	<p><strong>Ars Technica</strong> has published perhaps the most <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/guides/2009/09/surfing-the-google-wave.ars" title="Ars Technica: Turning the Tide - a Hands-on Look at Google's Wave">in-depth write-up thus far</a>, concluding that  Google Wave “is already showing signs of success as a catalyst for accelerating our ascent towards the Internet of the future”. Not all coverage has been positive, however: Robert Scoble is <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/01/google-wave-crashes-on-beach-of-overhype/" title="Scobleizer: Google Wave Crashes on Beach of Overhype">certainly not a fan</a>, going so far as to claim that “Google’s Wave will crash hard onto the beach of overhype” and that it “brings the worst of email and IM together: unproductivity”.</p>

	<p>There’s no doubting that Wave will have a huge impact one way or another when it finally makes its way into general release, but as an example of generating online buzz it is already an unqualified success. We’ll be having a more in-depth look at Google Wave’s features and all the potential uses for it from a Social Media and marketing point of view in the near future.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contentandmotion.co.uk/social-media-pr-blog/google-wave-coverage-round-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<script type="text/javascript">
	// <![CDATA[
		(function() {
			document.write('<script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="http://contentmotion.disqus.com/get_num_replies_from_wpid.js?v=2.2&amp;t=span&amp;wpid0=7075&amp;wpid1=3885"><' + '/script>');

		})();
	//]]>
	</script>
</channel>
</rss>
